Saturday, November 29, 2014

Mary Poppins Production Review


For my play review, I analyzed Berkeley Playhouse’s production of Mary Poppins. For the purposes of the assignment, I chose to focus on two of the main characters, Mary and Bert, played by Taylor Jones and Alex Rodriguez, respectively. This musical was interesting to analyze because of the use of English dialects. Although every actor in the show used a dialect, the English accents varied based on the character and especially the character’s social status. For example, Bert, a chimney sweep, had a Cockney accent, while Mary, whose character is more prim and proper, had a more high-class, RP accent. I used the outline for our vocal recipes to analyze both actor’s vocal use in this particular show. For the character of Mary Poppins, Taylor Jones’s voice was crisp, concise, and quick. The matter-of-fact tone and tempo added to the character’s no-nonsense attitude. However, I thought that with the addition of the accent, her articulation could have been sharper, particularly T’s and D’s at the ends of words. Pronunciation was, of course, affected by the difference in American and British pronunciation, as many words are. One that particularly stood out to me was the pronunciation of the word “advertisement.” While Americans generally stress the third syllable and pronounce the word with a long “I” sound, the actors in this production stressed the second syllable and pronounced it with a short “I” sound, as to stay true to the culture of the characters they were portraying. Jones tended to use higher pitches at the ends of her sentences, with the highest pitch on the last word. Her lowest pitches seemed to lie right in her general speaking register, which was slightly lower than average for a woman. I found her voice to be a bit breathy and wanted more resonance, but I enjoyed her voice’s sweet, smooth, and light quality, and felt it was appropriate for the character. My only other criticism is that I felt some vowels, especially I’s, Y’s, and O’s didn’t completely match the British dialect the character requires, and a lack of length in vowels affected some of the higher soprano notes. Rodriguez’s use of voice for Bert’s character was dynamic and versatile. He used a wide variety of pitches, even playing with them in extra ways, such as sliding between pitches at certain points, particularly on “O” vowels. I thought his Cockney accent was spot on and his vowels very well placed, especially his Y’s, such as when he said “Mary.” You could see how hard his mouth was working articulation-wise and every consonant was easily heard and understood. I learned a lot from observing his use of tempo. He spoke slowly, so the audience could follow every single word, but not so slowly that his lines dragged on too long. When he sang he seemed to be resonating especially from higher places, like his forehead and the top of his head, but he also had some really nice chest resonance when he spoke. As far as word choice, the character used the term “gov’na” multiple times, which, in addition to the accent, added to the character’s lower social status. One thing I really appreciated about this actor was his use of nonverbals. Whether it was small laughs or sighs or even a little “mmm” of agreement, he was constantly responding and reacting to what was happening around him, even if he didn’t have a scripted line. I think it helped him connect to the honesty of the character because he was responding so naturally throughout the entire show. With both actors, I might have liked a bit more volume, even though they were miked and the space wasn’t particularly large. In all, I thought both actors, particularly Rodriguez, used their voices well and appropriately for their characters.

If You Forget Me Rehearsal Video


As an experiment, for this rehearsal, I had my boyfriend film me so I could say the words directly to him. Because he is the person I am addressing in the poem, I thought it would be interesting to see how actually saying it to him influenced the piece, for example, which things were harder to say and where I found new moments of vulnerability.

Things I liked about this rehearsal:

I thought my "O" vowels were nice and long on certain words, particularly moon, slow, and long. I really liked the way I emphasized the word "destined" towards the end of the poem. I also liked my volume change on the word "sweetness" to the point that it was almost whispered. Watching the video back, I also noticed that I used thin chords fairly regularly throughout the poem, which I liked for certain lines such as "I shall stop loving you little by little" because I think it supports the feeling that it is not an easy thing to say and adds to the emotion behind it. However, I think I can go through and score my poem where thin chords may be appropriate to use so I don't overdo it.


Things to improve upon:

I noticed my alignment was a little off from the beginning. My left foot was behind my right foot a bit, and since my feet were square, I was putting some extra weight into my right hip. My head was also weirdly tilted to one side and my chin was pointed down through a lot of the piece. I think some of that might have been because my boyfriend and the phone camera were below me, so my focus was lower than normal, but I know I have a tendency to point my chin down during strong emotional moments, so I think it's something I definitely need to watch out for. I didn't think my articulation was very strong this time around, and I swallowed a lots of my T's and made them glottal. I especially noticed this on the word "forgotten." I also felt I was not as connected to my breath, which may be why I was using thin chords so much. I think there are moments to use them, but I think I need to also search for moments of more strength and resonance. Generally, I thought my voice was sitting a bit lower than normal, and there was almost some vocal fry creeping in. This may be due to the fact that I was tired and filmed this at 1 a.m. without being fully warmed up. I rushed into saying "were little boats that sail..." and think I could've used a stronger pause there. I also realized in watching this that when I hit words vocally, I mimic the emphasis with my hands. I think this can work to really hit certain words but I do it so much that I think it's weakening my gestures. Finally, I need to hold the final moment longer and not take a step backwards to get out of it.

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Extra Article - Listen to Poetry


Poetry Out Loud: Listen to Poetry

http://www.poetryoutloud.org/poems-and-performance/listen-to-poetry

Extra Article - Jo Estill and the Singing Voice



http://thesingingvoice.com/about/vocal-technique/jo-estill

Reading Response: The Second Circle - Voice

I really like the section at the beginning of this chapter that describes the voice we strive for as "direct, clear, free, and connected to us." However, it goes on to discuss of the tension in our bodies and habits we develop over the years can keep us from our Second Circle voice, which according to the text, "sounds as you really mean to sound." I thought the idea that the Second Circle voice sounds how we intend to sound was really interesting. It reminded me of when you first get a script or scene and some lines don't feel entirely natural coming out of your mouth yet, at least in my experience. Discovering how to speak the text naturally is part of connecting to your Second Circle voice. The text also discusses the commonplace exchange of "how are you?" and states, "This simple but important exchange is universal in all families and workplaces, but it is not effective unless you are speaking and responding in Second Circle voice." Often times, it seems we fall into the trap of the automatic response "I'm good" when anyone asks how we are. An automatic, disconnected response like this prevents us from having any sort of real Second Circle communication. I had an acting teacher once that challenged us to look whoever was asking us "how are you?" directly in the eye and respond truthfully, whether we were doing well or not. Because people are so used to the stereotypical "I'm good," this type of honesty often comes as a surprise. However, if you let yourself communicate honestly like that, then ask how they are in return, the person will be more likely to also respond in an honest way, which fosters truthful, Second Circle communication where both parties care what the other is saying. In considering whether I have a first, second, or third circle voice, I find that I lean more towards third circle, because I sometimes find my head jutting forward when I speak and I tend to push my voice. Sometimes I find people tuning me out and I will continue to talk to try to get their attention to no avail, in a controlling Third Circle manner. In looking through the exercises and suggestions to place you in Second Circle voice, I really liked the idea of imagining you are speaking to a good friend who is supportive of you and on your side in order to create movement, color, and relaxation in your voice.

Extra Article: Tongue Twisters (for articulation warm ups!)



http://www.bbbpress.com/2013/02/drama-games-tongue-twisters-the-ultimate-list/

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

"Mushrooms" by Sylvia Plath Rehearsal Video



I didn't really warm up before rehearsing my poem, since we had class that morning, but I can see a definite shift just from being out of class for a few hours. I don't think my voice sounded as free as it does when I am in class and fully warmed up, and at the end of some sentences, I could hear some vocal fry creeping in. I find it a lot easier to connect to the piece when there is a give and take of energy with other people in the room, like when we present our poems in class. In this case, I was speaking to a wall and definitely didn't feel as present as I have before. Like we've talked about in class, I think I can continue to slow down the beginning of the poem and build the energy and pace as it goes. There are a few times in this video where I notice I kind of rushed into one line from another. Gesturing naturally isn't normally an issue for me, but I think because I wasn't as present as I have been, I was more aware of my movements and they weren't as natural as normal. Finally, I think I broke the moment at the end of the poem too soon and should've held it longer for a stronger conclusion.